![]() Backup from Linode to your Windows machine (probably have to be incrementally even with a very fast Internet connection) where BackBlaze will do the rest so long as the backup file is in a Windows directory and isn't too, too big (which is what I used to do before DreamHost) Write your own backup (rsync via cron, which is what I did on DreamHost VPS just before I moved here to Linode) between your Linodes, but that probably says you should move one of the linodes to another data centre, rather than having them all in the Japanese data centre ħ. Purchase Linode's Backup for each Linode (what I do now) ĥ. There are several choices for the Linode Linux backups:ģ. effort tolerance, that are slightly different than what you asked, but are my personal preference, and what I do now.Īll involve using BackBlaze to backup your Windows home machine. Still not as cheap as backblaze, which also comes with all the client software… ĭescription A couple of choices to consider, depending on your cost v.s. But it's definitely MUCH cheaper than S3. Additional charges (retrieval fees, bandwidth fees, early deletion fees) would probably add another buck or two. The idea that anybody would consider S3 cheap for this is laughable: S3 would charge $62.50 per month just to store that 500 gigs, and there would be any bandwidth and IO charges on top of that. ![]() (I don't and wouldn't use it for backing up web servers since I prefer to manage that on a more stringent basis.) īacking up your home: BackBlaze. I don't work for them, but I do use them at home to backup three Macs and one Linux media server. If your home internet connection isn't the fastest, you can pay extra and seed the backup with a hard drive by mail. Instead of $3.96/mo per machine it's $6/mo for up to 10 machines and unlimited backup space. It supports Windows and OS X ****and Linux****. Instead of BackBlaze, look into ~~()~~(). Still not as cheap as backblaze, which also comes with all the client software… But it's definitely MUCH cheaper than S3\. So it's not going to back up your linode. The downside? Windows and OS X only (and it won't do network drives), so it's really just meant for desktops and workstations, not servers. > BackBlaze is $3.96 a month (in a lump payment, $5/mth otherwise), and provides unlimited storage for a single machine. (I don't and wouldn't use it for backing up web servers since I prefer to manage that on a more stringent basis.) Instead of BackBlaze, look into CrashPlan. Still not as cheap as backblaze, which also comes with all the client up your home: BackBlaze. ![]() Still not as cheap as backblaze, which also comes with all the client software… Backing up your home: BackBlaze. ![]() The idea that anybody would consider S3 cheap for this is laughable: S3 would charge $62.50 per month just to store that 500 gigs, and there would be any bandwidth and IO charges on top of that.īackBlaze is $3.96 a month (in a lump payment, $5/mth otherwise), and provides unlimited storage for a single machine. Description Backing up your home: BackBlaze.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |